SARPA Logo
   
   Home    Aims & Objectives    Meetings    Join SARPA    Contact Us    News   Archive    Arriva Trains Wales     Links     
 Passengers disembark at Machynlleth
    


THE SHREWSBURY - ABERYSTWYTH RAIL PASSENGERS' ASSOCIATION WELCOMES YOU TO THEIR WEBSITE

This page updated 5th April 2013

SARPA is the local rail users group for the Shrewsbury to Aberystwyth line running from the English border through Montgomeryshire to the coast of North Ceredigion and ending up in the increasingly important University (and Assembly administration ) town of Aberystwyth. We exist to preserve and promote the line so that there is a more sustainable transport system for future generations. SARPA is one of the more active rail user groups in Wales and meets monthly. We are continually campaigning on various issues from train times and frequency to station maintenance and welcome any comments anybody has about the rail service in Mid Wales.

We hope that during 2012, Arriva continues to make improvements.

We are also pressing for the introduction of the hourly service on the line, which was promised for 2011 by Welsh Assembly Government.

CHAIRMAN'S MESSAGE

In 1964, an architect called Christopher Alexander published a book entitled "Notes on the Synthesis of Form". He began:- "These notes are about the process of design; the process of inventing physical things which display a new physical order, organisation, form, in response to function.

Today, functional problems are becoming less simple all the time. But designers rarely confess their ability to solve them. Instead, when a designer does not understand a problem clearly enough to find the order it really calls for, he falls back on some arbitrarily chosen formal order. The problem, because of its complexity remains unsolved."


How prescient for our own age! We live in an increasingly complex society, something which Alexander had commented upon when he first wrote his book. He said that over long periods of time, ethnic cultures had evolved design solutions which were well suited to function. Buildings and artefacts were made in a certain way which became a tradition. Because of our quickly changing society, we do not have the luxury of this slow method of evolution. He pointed out that rather than approaching design in an intuitive manner, a more rational approach was necessary.

He outlined the case for what he called "Hierarchical Decomposition of Systems"; a close examination of design problems which involved extensive use of mathematics. Essentially, what he was investigating was a digital approach to design. He wrote a computer program to look at the relationships between design parameters which ran on an IBM 7090, an extremely impressive machine for its time, with a computing power of around 3mb/sec and a total memory of around 1mb. However, you needed a Very Large Room in which to put it and a pocket filled with 2.8 million American Dollars to buy. Remember that when you plug in your laptop on one of Arriva's Class 158s.

Alexander's words resonated with your chairman as a callow youth. At the time, I was spending quite a bit of time working on steam locomotives and understood quickly that there must have been a better way to design these things. For instance, why put all the valve gear in the middle of the framing where nobody could get to it? And dead loss lubrication systems? They were just........well, a dead loss. A persistent failure to deal with the problems had led to a machine which could have been a much more effective tool being outclassed by other technology.

Today's railway is very much a complex structure. The way it has wound up is essentially based on the idea that the government directs and the private sector provides the service, whilst the taxpayer picks up the tab. This was probably not how the brave new privatised railway was envisaged by its Tory protagonists in the wake of the 1992 UK general election, but that is what we have. We can more or less say with certainty that they did not work through their ideas and consider all the implications of what they were about to do, and we have to live with the consequences.

I could be forgiven if I believed that the way since 1960 that the various governments of the United Kingdom have approached the management of the railway, has been to train a ferret to hold a dartboard, pin ideas to it, then blindfold someone and ask them to throw. (There is actually such a game - without the ferret - called "Audio Darts" !) As evidence that this mindset is presently alive and well I offer the fiasco of the West Coast Franchise, the IEP replacement for the HST and just now, HS2 which - Heigh Ho! - fails completely to serve important places it passes. Leicester has been completely left out, whilst Nottingham, Derby and Sheffield all have stations in the middle of nowhere. Seems that some of the lessons from Wales have not been learned...... Llanbister Road, Builth Road, Cemmaes Road.......... "Nottingham and Derby Road"? "Sheffield Road"? Meanwhile, the opportunity to re-link the East Midlands with the North West has not been taken at all.

"When a designer does not understand a problem clearly enough to find the order it really calls for , he falls back on some arbitrarily chosen formal order." Here in Wales we have the situation where the Welsh Government has decided to spend another £500m on the A 465 Heads of the Valleys Road, despite a poor cost benefit analysis (CBA). The total spend of approximately £800m on this road represents enough money to have replaced the railway between Mid and South Wales, via Llanidloes, Builth and Brecon; this would have taken towns not at present on the network back onto the railway and contributed to growth in the Welsh economy.

A well planned railway is difficult to achieve but has benefits for the community which reach far beyond the station forecourt, enabling connectivity without the expense of owning a road vehicle. This is especially true for Wales, where connections are so astonishingly bad for a modern European nation. In reality, beyond the forecourt is where the real consequences of the railway (or the lack of one) make themselves felt, which is where Christopher Alexander comes in. He took the view that one must not only look at all the parameters regarding the thing itself which was being designed ("the form") but also the way that item interacted with the rest of the world ("the context"). In this respect, local and urban administrations have intuitively picked up the message rather better than central government. This is probably more from self interest than anything else, as local transport planners themselves are more likely to use and benefit from service enhancements! Municipal enlightenment has provided the impetus for investment in local rail, which has brought benefit to those communities courageous enough to build and reopen. Consider if you will, those brave souls who planned and instigated the Tyne & Wear Metro. A very controversial project it was in gestation and building, but the region would not be without it now. Moreover, since it opened every other big conurbation now wants a surface tram style metro! Remember also those folk who planned and executed the Cross City Link in Birmingham from Longbridge to Lichfield, later extended to Redditch,, now a central transport linchpin in the West Midlands .

In contrast, over the past 50 years or so (and even beyond), intervention by central governments have been somewhat lacklustre at best and have not worked in the interests of the railway; neither have the objectives of the protagonists been achieved. In the wake of the Beeching closures , it's almost as though central government lost its way and has no clear vision as to what the railway is actually for. Better, more enlightened thinking is clearly needed for governments to succeed in their chosen role as "designer of the railway". On the 50th anniversary of the infamous Doctor's "Reshaping" report, surely its time to wake up and start reopening railway lines. Doesn't fresh coffee smell great?

Angus Eickhoff
Moel y Garth
Welshpool

March 2013





You can see what we said about the railway industry in the past by clicking on this link to our archive page. We have archived all the newsletters back to November 2001.




Views expressed on the SARPA website are those of contributors and not necessarily representative of the Association and its Officers as a whole. Information provided is published in good faith, but the Association cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising therefrom.

The Webmaster reserves the right to abridge or amend copy.


Please note that hyperlinks included in the text throughout this site are intended for the benefit and information of our visitors. We try to include links that will be helpful for the understanding of railway terminology. They do not constitute an endorsement or recommendation on our part.


Shrewsbury to Aberystwyth Rail Passengers Association (SARPA)
   Llidiart Wood,   Moel y Garth,  Welshpool,  Powys,  SY21 9JF,  Wales,  United Kingdom
© SARPA 2005-2013
All Rights Reserved
Website:- Angus Eickhoff